Home > Forums

[Lynn Burke]

Supreme Court says no to recruiting

By Mark Sherman | Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Friday night lights are lure enough for young football players, the Supreme Court said Thursday in a decision that upholds limits on high school sports recruiting.

The high court ruled in a dispute between a Tennessee athletic association and a football powerhouse, the private Brentwood Academy near Nashville.

The school challenged a rule of the Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, which governs high school sports in the state. The association bars schools from contacting prospective students about their sports programs.

Games have rules, wrote Justice John Paul Stevens in the unanimous decision. "It is only fair that Brentwood follow them."

"Hard-sell tactics directed at middle school students could lead to exploitation, distort competition between high school teams and foster an environment in which athletics are prized more highly than academics," Stevens wrote.

Brentwood argued that the restriction violated its free-speech rights, even though it voluntarily joined the association.

The dispute arose from a letter that Brentwood's football coach sent to a dozen eighth-graders in 1997, inviting them to attend spring training at the school. The students already had been accepted and signed enrollment contracts for the fall at Brentwood but were not yet attending the school.

Brentwood coach Carlton Flatt, who stepped down as coach in December after 34 years, told the boys that equipment would be distributed and "getting involved as soon as possible would definitely be to your advantage." He signed the letter, "Your Coach."

In Tennessee, as in many other states, high school football is played on Friday nights. Some towns practically shut down as people head to the game.

"It is a heady thing," Stevens said, for an eighth grader to be contacted directly by a coach and invited to join a high school sports team.

He compared the case to one in which the court upheld a state bar association's limits on solicitations by lawyers. "The dangers of undue influence that exist when a lawyer chases an ambulance are also present when a high school coach contacts an eighth grader," Stevens said.

Brentwood, like the other 375 or so public and private schools in the association, remains free to send brochures, post billboards and otherwise advertise its sports programs, he said.

The case had previously been before the Supreme Court. In 2001, the court ruled 5-4 in favor of Brentwood, saying the athletic association acted in a quasi-governmental capacity and could be sued.

A federal appeals court later ruled in favor of the school, saying the letter amounted to protected speech under the First Amendment. That ruling would prevent all high school associations from enforcing recruiting rules, lawyers for the state athletic association said.

"Whether it's vindication, we feel very happy with the ruling because by the ruling, it lets not only Tennessee know but also the high school associations across the nation that we still can enforce our rules," said Gene Menees, the Tennessee association's assistant director.

The NCAA, the National School Boards Association and the National Federation of State High School Associations backed the Tennessee athletic association, saying broad powers are needed to protect children by enforcing recruiting rules. The Bush administration also argued in support of the association, urging the high court to reverse the lower court decision.

Brentwood Academy had support from the National Women's Law Center, which worried about holding government accountable for gender discrimination. The Association of Christian Schools International and the National Association of Independent Schools also sided with Brentwood.

The case is Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy, 06-427.

---

AP Sports Writer Teresa M. Walker contributed to this report from Nashville, Tenn.

[ChargerTribe0610]

A couple of local schools come to mind who could benefit, if only spiritually, from reading this...

Schools like that are the reason I can only be 99.9999999% proud of my private education, rather than 100%.

[KHSnewschool]

Hmmmmm, what local schools would be involved in recruiting???? Cough-HHS-Cough-PHS-Cough....

[ChargerTribe0610]

Originally Posted by ChargerTribe0610

of my PRIVATE education

[sbfan9]

When you say 'local schools' are you referring to public or private or perhaps both? Seems to me, schools, public and private, do recruiting.

[ChargerTribe0610]

*Goes back and read what he typed and re-typed*
I was definitely referring to private schools.

I've been involved in sports information for the private schools of the area for going on six years now, and it's amazing the stories one hears.

Since anyone that wants to can enroll in a private school in any locality they want (if they pass entrance requirements), it's an infinitely bigger problem to regulate them. Public school enrollment is almost exclusively a geographic issue (barring IB, etc.), so it's a little more obvious.

When kids play baseball for Denbigh High School and have home addresses in Poquoson, you might raise an eyebrow. When kids play for Denbigh Baptist with home addresses in Poquoson, you have no reason to care.

And btw I'm NOT implicating Denbigh HS or DBCS. I know personally that Denbigh Baptist runs one of the most respectable athletic programs in the VISAA; I just used them as my example for proximity's sake.

[sbfan9]

Thanks. I thought you were referring to private schools but I wanted to make sure. I think private schools could easily skirt the recruiting rules without getting caught and I'm sure a few do. However, I have heard rumors about certain public schools on the southside doing the same thing. Doesn't seem fair when most play by the rules.